College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Students protest Sodexo actions

Published: Thursday, February 25, 2010

Updated: Thursday, February 25, 2010


Following the termination of Terry Shelly, a former Orleans Room worker, students rallied Feb. 22 to send demands to Sodexo management.

On Feb. 22, 27 students and several Loyola University Sodexo employees gathered at the post office loading dock and walked into the Danna Center, through the St. Charles Room and into the Loyola Dining Services office to speak with Sodexo management and to submit a letter concerning the termination of Shelly and the recognition of the workers’ union.

The letter stated that Shelly’s termination “resulted from a lack of communication of current Sodexo policies” and requested that Shelly’s “unjust termination is remedied immediately.” In the letter, students demanded Sodexo reinstate Shelly’s job, issue an apology to Shelly and give Shelly back pay.

Students met Feb. 19 to discuss Monday’s course of action. The final decision was to present the letter in the same way workers and students presented the workers’ petition to management Jan. 14.

“In the same model, we wanted to get students and workers together to approach management about the unjust policies surrounding (Shelly) getting fired,” Jamie Broussard, sociology senior and co-chairwoman of Loyola University Community Action Program, said.

As student spokesman, Rolando Lopez, English writing sophomore, spoke with Heather Bacque, Sodexo general manager, to “express discontent to Sodexo for firing Terry Shelly.”

Bacque was “not at liberty to discuss (Shelly’s) employment” and could not accept the letter, she said as Lopez presented it.

The students taped the letter  to the Dining Services door. Bacque is unaware of the letter’s current location.

Ben Hartley, Sodexo area manager, was also unable to comment.

Lee Ann Moss, political science senior, noted that students are paying customers of Sodexo.

“The general hesitation to talk to customers is a negative customer service practice in that specific instance,” she said.

Broussard agreed.

“The fact that management would not come to speak with us is fundamentally a customer service issue,” she said.

Though management refused to speak with the students at that time, Chad Carson, sociology senior and co-chairman of LUCAP, said he believes students should not give up.

 “We are ready to take further action in case they don’t meet our demands by the deadline we issued in the letter,” Carson said.

The deadline was Feb. 24 and management presented no response.

“(We will) keep doing appropriate student action and persist until Sodexo addresses the issues,” Lopez said.

Though Sodexo policies have remained the same, students are still content about the outcome.

“I thought it was amazing how this event came about,” Carson said. “It was truly a collaboration between students and workers to craft the demands and decide how we were going to proceed with this.”

Lopez noted that students are not leading the campaign for Sodexo workers unionizing; they are simply supporting them. 

“We made the campus aware of what is going on. We made management aware that this is a student thing … the students are supporting the workers,” Lopez said.

“Our presence means something,” he said. “I think that’s something Sodexo needs to know.”



Precious Esie can be reached at

piesie@loyno.edu


 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

15 comments

Anonymous
Thu Mar 4 2010 01:06
For real though. I totally am into this precious person.
Anonymous
Mon Mar 1 2010 16:26
Precious! You go girl!
Anonymous
Fri Feb 26 2010 14:24
So one thief accuses someone else of doing the same thing ….what a surprise.
Everyone should be happy that there is one less bad apple in the cafeteria, my guess is that there are MANY more and I hope that all of the dishonest workers get terminated as well, why should they get a free ride without consequence.....this isn't government work.
Anonymous
Fri Feb 26 2010 01:08
If Sodexho workers are all stealing, fire all of them, and unions are bad news. Look at our education system now. We need reform, reform without unions.
Anonymous
Fri Feb 26 2010 00:54
Chris,

Your voices are not being heard. This should have been obvious when the people you wanted to hear them refused to read what you wrote, then tore it down when you taped it up. Maybe you should reconsider your methods instead of claiming this as a great victory for worker's rights.

Christopher Sauer
Fri Feb 26 2010 00:47
All you guys posting crap about this being ridiculous can go and do what you usually do on the internet. We feel it pertinent to make our voice heard. And you don't. So don't disrespect? Have problems? Confront us in campus, you cowards.

Dear Anon "esto vir"

Anonymous
Fri Feb 26 2010 00:10
I'm happy for you.
Alexia Moore
Fri Feb 26 2010 00:02
I'm a Maroon commenter and writing quips in Latin makes me seem intelligent!
Anonymous
Thu Feb 25 2010 23:47
I for one don't think it's okay.

Hopefully LUCAP comes up with a sufficiently eye-catching memo header to change Sodexo's mind, too.

Dum spiro, spero

Anonymous
Thu Feb 25 2010 22:25
So the fact that multiple employees engage in this same practice EVERY SINGLE DAY but only one was fired without warning is a fine labor practice by your standards?
Anonymous
Thu Feb 25 2010 22:21
Anon at 21 23. Too funny.
Anonymous
Thu Feb 25 2010 22:13
Student At Loyola

I did read it. A rule was broken and the employee threw others under the bus. Admirable. Your point is ?

Anonymous
Thu Feb 25 2010 21:23
It's great to see that Loyola students are accomplishing so much! I mean, taping a letter to a door, that's quite a victory. Way to stick it to the man, man!
Student at Loyno
Thu Feb 25 2010 19:59
Dear Anon at 17:34:

Your semi-applicable quotation seems to imply that Ms. Shelly claims she didn't let the police officer or her supervisor's children into the Orleans Room. Incorrect.

Please read the article entitled "Employee says union caused termination" for details.

Looking forward to your response.

Anonymous
Thu Feb 25 2010 17:34
Yawn.

To quote, "My Cousin Vinny":

Once again, the communication process broken down. It appears to me that you want to skip the arraignment process, go directly to trial, skip that, and get a dismissal. Well, I'm not about to revamp the entire judicial process just because you find yourself in the unique position of defending clients who say they didn't do it.







log out