Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Smoking policy not enforced

Published: Thursday, April 29, 2010

Updated: Friday, April 30, 2010 15:04

SMOKERS

ELLE MALONEY/Photo Editor

Freshman physcology major, SarahBeth Eumont, smokes a cigarette on the steps of the library Wednesday, April 28, 2010.

Smoking

Kevin Zansler/Senior Staff Photographer

Philosophy sophomore Gregory Hopkins smokes a cigarette on the smoker's benches across from the Monroe Library Wednesday, April 28.


The smoking policy has been in effect a little over a year now, but there's still plenty confusion as to whose responsibility it is to enforce it.

The policy, which the Student Government Association and the Rev. Kevin Wildes, S.J., university president,  approved fall of 2008, limited smoking areas to 10 locations on the main campus and four locations on the Broadway campus.

"It is our responsibility as university staff people to remind students or other staff or faculty where the smoking areas are, but we aren't solely responsible," Roger Pinac, Loyola University Police Department captain, said.

Pinac, who is not a smoker, said it is a community responsibility to remind smokers where the designated areas are located.

Neefiyah Mousa, chemical engineering freshman and Buddig Hall desk assistant, said that although desk assistants try to enforce the policy, students continue smoking regardless.

"People still smoke out there. They try to get away with it. But I mean, and sometimes people as the desk fuss at them, sometimes they don't," she said.

"It's not consistent, so they're going to keep doing it," Mousa said.

While some smoke anywhere on campus, Ross Schneider, international business sophomore, said he would stay away from areas that had the "No Smoking" signs.

"I only come to areas where I only see people smoke," Schneider said.

Student Affairs Vice President Robert Reed felt the current process has been effective on a general level.

"I would say 90 percent maybe more. Most individuals have complied with the policy and live within it and maybe some people have not, on occasion," Reed said.

"But not significant enough to effect the quality of life and environment and everything else here at Loyola."

According to Mousa, the policy in place has not been helpful.

"I don't think the policy is really helping because maybe not that many people know about the policy. We know about it because they notify us at the desk but I don't think students who are smoking know about it at all," she said.

 "If they do, then they don't really care, which they should, because I don't like breathing in their smoke."

Schneider said he thinks the designated smoking areas are fair.

"There are a lot of people that don't want to get the secondhand smoke," Schneider said.

Reed also addressed the issue of overhead covers.

There is only one covered area, located at the corner of Buddig Hall and Carrollton Hall. To his knowledge, there is no progress on covering any of the other areas.

"The question is, you know, if you provide covered smoking areas," said Reed. "Are you providing and enabling people to continue to participate in a habit that is really not healthy for them or anybody else around them?"

It is a habit the university is not encouraging, Reed said.

"Do we really want to encourage people to smoke? I don't think the university really wants to do that."

 

Monica Vo can be reached at qavo@loyno.edu




 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

11 comments

Aaron Miller
Sat May 22 2010 18:10
Hey, since we're discouraging unhealthy habits, let's stop selling candy bars and chips in the Market, since these items have virtually no nutritional value. Also, let's pull all the soda machines from campus, because, let's be honest, soda isn't healthy in any way, shape, or form. Let's stop serving dessert in the OR altogether.

The logic that Robert Reed and the rest of you silly liberals are using would support the above. It's not healthy, so let's not encourage it (I would argue that providing a covered smoking area isn't really encouraging smoking at all; on the contrary, it is providing smokers an area where they can smoke and not bother other people with their habit). I would argue that by selling and profiting off the sale of candy bars, Loyola is encouraging people to eat them.

Th point is that we are all legal adults here, capable of making our own decisions. It isn't Robert Reed's job to make students not smoke. The entire reason the smoking areas were created was to stop the practice of forcing non-smokers to walk through crowds of smokers. The intention wasn't to stop students from smoking. Brendan Muse said it best; it's offensive and idiotic that Robert Reed took a policy designed to respect the rights of non-smokers and is using it to limit the freedoms of students who choose to smoke.

J. Macasieb
Fri May 21 2010 16:05
Reed must be a liberal the way he's using this "father knows best" talking point. I dont smoke in front of Res Halls, I avoid being around people and tend to move if someone is clearly agrivated by the fact that I'm smoking. All we would like is one or two more covers so when the torrential summer rains show up at the beginning of next semester, we dont get soaked.
Loyola Sophomore
Tue May 11 2010 13:15
Anonymous at 23:59-

I actually don't smoke either, although I used to. First of all, it is the the smoker's air just as much as it is yours. Second, the problem that smokers continue to complain about is that there are no COVERED smoking areas on campus. When it rains in New Orleans (quite frequently, if you've ever been here), there are no where for smokers to smoke. Maybe if there were more of these covered areas (and I guarantee you they could be implemented where non-smokers would not be bothered), smokers would use them, therefore stopping the practice of lighting up right outside the doors to Monroe, Bobet, etc. But then again, idiots like Robert Reed prevent any real progress from taking place by taking on the role of playing mommy and daddy to the university students.

Anonymous
Sun May 9 2010 16:25
When these students develop emphysema and cancer, they will be wishing that this smoking policy was enforced. But, kids will be kids. They think they are invincible at that college age.
Anonymous
Thu May 6 2010 23:59
Loyola Sophomore,

I don't smoke and I have the legal right to breath. So guess what? My right trumps yours. Kill your lungs if you please, but I prefer not to be affected by your senseless addiction

CM Punk
Thu May 6 2010 01:52
These weak people need to be saved and join the Straightedge Society...
CM Punk
Thu May 6 2010 01:48
I don't smoke and people who do...are stupid.
Anonymous
Sat May 1 2010 12:08
Brendan Muse,

There has always been thousands of errant cigarette butts strewn about campus since as long as i can remember. Forgetting about "Loyola Sophomore's" point that students have a 'right' to smoke (which I would argue is not a right at all, but a privilege') there is a secondary problem that smokers, on our campus and virtually everywhere else in the world, are disrespectful and treat their own habit as if others have a duty to somewhere support their nicotine addiction. This is crazy and backwards. I mean, I love cussing and have a god-given 'right to do it, but Loyola does not provide me a free-cussing space or protect my ability to do so anywhere on campus. If I were to stand outside the Danna Center cussing every couple of breaths I would be (and have been) approached by various University administrators and required to stop.

Loyola should not support a student's right to smoke any more than it should support a student's right to have casual unmarried sex or a student's right to skip class. These are areas where Loyola wants students to develop positive attitudes and behaviors, and to the contrary has an obligation to help shape students toward positive behaviors through policies and education.

Anonymous
Fri Apr 30 2010 12:55
Its not about discouraging smoking - its about keeping smokers in areas where their smoke isn't forced upon those who don't want to be veiled in smoke. It is hardly an oppressive plan. Smokers are the most annoying people...
Loyola Sophomore
Fri Apr 30 2010 02:26
Dear Robert Reed,

It is not your's nor the university's job to discourage students to not smoke. If the students wish to smoke, they have every legal right to do so. Stop having the administration play parents over the students; it's not your job.

Brendan Muse
Thu Apr 29 2010 23:06
When I was a freshman in fall of 06, there were ash trays and cigarette slot things all over campus. I was personally ecstatic about the free smoking policy: when everyone can smoke, they don't feel compelled to smoke in the bathroom and screw things up for everyone else. Even though I have asthma, I never had any breathing problems walking through smoking areas.

When the new policy was announced last spring, I knew that it wouldn't do anything. The only change is that now there are cigarette butts all over campus, wherever people walk. It's an idiotic policy, and it's offensive that Mr. Reed wants to uphold it to try to discourage smokers.







log out