College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

SGA President asks two justices to resign

Published: Thursday, October 15, 2009

Updated: Friday, October 16, 2009

The Student Government Association president asked two court justices to resign from their positions because she believes they are members of 1540, a secret society at Loyola.

SGA President and marketing junior, Sarah Cooper, asked finance senior Blake Gable and mass communication senior Brian Dirden, to resign.

In April of 2009, when Cooper had to decide who would be on the court, former SGA President Cade Cypriano, A’09, and Cooper approached both justices and asked for their resignations.

Cypriano was certain of their membership and said Chris Cameron, the former director of co-curricular activities who no longer works at Loyola, and Marcia “Cissy” Petty, vice president for student affairs and associate provost, both confirmed their memberships.

“Their denial was cause for concern because their membership had already been confirmed by an anonymous source and then confirmed through the administration,” he said. “The fact that they were dishonest and not forthright with their membership led to concerns of their ability to serve effectively in positions that require the utmost respect and transparency.”

Dirden resigned saying he would not have time to perform his duties as a justice. He said he was not a member of 1540.

“I don’t even know if 1540 exists,” he said. “However, I was approached by Cade Cypriano and Sarah Cooper for me to resign as a justice because of allegations of me being a part of 1540.”

Gable, who has not resigned, declined to comment.

Cooper said of Gable’s decision not to resign, “When it comes to the board, it’s all about consensus, and he has no pull.” She added the other justices will not agree with him.

Cooper said she believes the two justices are part of 1540, which is illegal on Loyola’s campus due to its lack of charter review.

“We asked them to confess to it,” she said. “But, they both kept saying that they had no idea what I was talking about.”

Cooper said this denial on their part upset her because she thought they were going against what it means to be a justice.

“It was really frustrating because as a justice you are supposed to uphold the constitution and they are a part of an organization that is not really an organization and they meet on campus and they have initiation on campus,” she said. “In the end they are being unfair to those organizations that have to go through charter review and those who lose their charter.”

Cooper spoke with Cameron. Cooper said that Cameron told her he founded this organization in 1998 with the purpose to support and promote Jesuit values by incorporating student leaders from different organizations on campus.

“He said that they do good things for people on campus,” Cooper said. She elaborated that Cameron told her of a time when they bought a plane ticket for a student who could not afford one, so the student could see their family.

Cameron, however, declined to comment about 1540.
 
Chief Justice and management junior Andrew Austermann said the court is looking into these two cases to see what will be done.

“We are going to take care of that within our group, whatever the president and myself decide before anything official comes out,” he said. “I think it’s inappropriate to comment on the entire situation until it has been resolved either one way or another.”

He added the decision will be based on what the constitution says. Austermann has not spoken to Gable about this issue, but said that he will as this process moves along.

Former student government presidents Cypriano and Elliot Sanchez, A’08, said they also believe this organization should cease to exist.

“My problem is that they pick off student leaders to join 1540 and then they no longer act independently,” Cypriano said.

Sanchez said he believes this organization should be chartered so it follows the same rules as the other legitimate school organizations.

“Organizations should fall under the system we have set up to ensure fair student body governance,” he said.

Cooper, Cypriano and Sanchez all agree that being a member 1540 and a justice of SGA represents a conflict of interest, and members of 1540 should be removed from the court.

“I see there’s a conflict with student governance where students are entrusted to look out for their own interest and the interest of the university,” Sanchez said.

Cypriano added that most in SGA see a dual membership in student government and 1540 as a conflict of interest.

“Those concerns were rooted in recurring allegations of election interference and a possible concern in judicial and legislative processes at the highest level of student government,” he said. “I was made aware of prior instances in which members of 1540 exhibited a degree of bias.”

During Cypriano’s administration, he with Chief Justice Sarah Melton and Vice President Ashley Shabankareh, established that SGA members cannot be a part of 1540 simultaneously.

“We established a precedent  of eliminating the presence of 1540 from SGA, because it was our view that 1540 members were in clear violation of an SGA constitutional clause that prohibited unchartered organizations, ignoring the student body’s demand for a trustworthy and transparent representative body,” Cypriano said.

According to Cypriano, Cameron was forced to admit to his role as leader of this organization, when he was confronted about conflicts in elections and court decisions.

“He then agreed with our decision to remove 1540 members from SGA,” he said.

It would all be different if they were chartered, Cypriano said.

“There wouldn’t be a problem with them if the entire student body was made aware of their dual membership and instances of bias or instances where a recusal of duty would be necessary would be addressed responsibly,” he said.

Eduardo Gonzalez can be reached at ejgonzal@loyno.edu

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

38 comments

Anonymous
Sat Feb 20 2010 03:50
GOSSIP.
Your name
Wed Oct 21 2009 23:10
I can't tell if you are stupid or naive, but that is a bunch of B.S. Let me quote the student code of conduct ... again (because, as I noted before, members of 1540 can't be bothered to read rules).

""Organization” and “Student Organization” means any number of persons who have
complied with University requirements for recognition as a club or organization."

Oh, and before you go ans say, "But MDXL isn't a student organization", let me re-quote the previous rule:

"A student is prohibited from affiliating and promoting non-recognized student organizations."

You aren't a division of the university. You aren't a department. You don't hold some special status in the university bylaws or charter (I know, because I bother to read rules.) Thus, you are an un-recognized student organization.

Nowhere does it say that "Recognized" means that a corrupt university bureaucrat knows about it. Instead, it is rather clear that to be "Recognized" you need to follow the rules, one of the most important being, that you need to be chartered.

So, again, let me say that the issue is that the justices were not upholding university rules, and they should BOTH step down.

your name
Wed Oct 21 2009 20:13
1540 is obviously recognized by the University. Chris Cameron worked for the University, therefore the University knows... 1540 isn't getting their money from SGA, so it is not a SGA issue. Since they are getting money from the University, it is an University issue. If the qualifications for "recognition" are a roll list of members, the University already has it.
Your name
Tue Oct 20 2009 12:45
Hey Straczynski, why don't you put Bartlett's down and speak for your self for once.
Your name
Tue Oct 20 2009 12:04
“People spend too much time finding other people to blame, too much energy finding excuses for not being what they are capable of being, and not enough energy putting themselves on the line, growing out of the past, and getting on with their lives.”
Who you think I am
Tue Oct 20 2009 11:13
Lets be serious. The whole issue boils down to justices upholding the rules of the university. Let me direct your attention to section XXV of the University Code of conduct. Since I already know that members of 1540 can't be bothered with reading rules, let me quote:

"XXV. Promotion of Non-recognized Student Organizations
A. A student is prohibited from affiliating and promoting non-recognized student organizations.
B. A student is prohibited from promoting the goals, purposes, identity, programs, or activities
for suspended organizations or organizations whose charters have been revoked."

Justices uphold the rules of SGA and the rules of the University. If they can't follow the rules themselves, then they need to be expelled from the court -- and maybe even the University.

Down with "MDXL"

Your name
Mon Oct 19 2009 22:06
“You shouldn't punish others for your own choices”
ramifications?
Sun Oct 18 2009 19:21
In light of these revelations, and the comments that have followed, I hope that the University plans to issue a statement regarding their knowledge and treatment of this situation. If the University encouraged Chris Cameron to leave for engaging in inappropriate conduct, and/or has knowledge of his misconduct, it might consider the ramifications of this sounding board. It appears that people are making serious allegations against students without reliable proof. Even if such proof does exist regarding student members of 1540, the University has enabled the group's operation despite previously being warned of the dangers of such a secret society. Therefore, the students being accused, whether involved in 1540 or not, have reason to question the University's failure to protect them.
Your name
Sat Oct 17 2009 21:39
Last semester LUCAP banned 1540 members from holding e-board positions, they even put it in there constitution. I've heard that it came out that Kathleen Warner and Jennifer Rudolph were part of 1540 and the rest of the e-board got word and bam. They banned all future e-board members from being part of it, despite not having the votes of the two previously mentioned members. Why can't we do it with SGA?
Your name
Sat Oct 17 2009 18:20
As a senator I will admit to being part of an unchartered organization where is my resignation request Ms. Cooper?
JJ
Sat Oct 17 2009 15:32
Who are the more recent members of 1540? It should be required that those students disclose their membership if they will serve on other chartered organizations where decisions are made that impact the school.
xica
Sat Oct 17 2009 15:30
What happened to Chris? Why is he not at Loyola any longer? Did someone finally realize all he did was mess with student's lives? He created drama where none was needed and his only concern was 1540 and its members. It's about time he left.
President Emeritus
Sat Oct 17 2009 00:37
As a former president myself and a receipent of 1540 hush money I can tell you the organization and its members do not have the good of the school at its core. When founded in 1998 it may have been an organization founded to bolster school spirit and pride however, under the leadership of Chris Cameron druing my time at Loyola it was just a cause for concern. The members of 1540 were controlled by Chris Cameron and many times my decisions as president were undermined by his influence on other members. It was also very striking that no president or vice president of the major organizations on campus were asked to join. It was only those that Chris thought he could control and they never realized they just thought he really liked them. Well I am glad Chris Cameron is gone and I am glad that someone is finally doing something about 1540. And for those who believe Loyola's money doesn't go to 1540 check the Student Activities budget. There is a hidden line item for 1540 I know for a fact.
Your name
Fri Oct 16 2009 23:10
It's about time they did something about 1540! Kudos to the SGA members who finally stood up to them and gave them the boot!
A Disgusted Alum
Fri Oct 16 2009 21:24
I won't resort to name calling - although I'd very much like to. But I agree with my fellow alum. It makes absolutely no sense to ask people to resign simply because you disaprove of their potential involvement with a secret organization. First of all, there is nothing in the SGA constitution that says students can't be involved in unofficial organizations. If there were, then there would be a problem with students being involved in any other non-Loyola recognized organizations for example, a certain bible study that used to be held every Monday night in the Loyola dorms. You could, by this logic, kick out anyone who attends a non-Loyola church, or belongs to a non-Loyola community service organization, etcetera. Secondly, 1540 does not ask Loyola for any money. The purpose of having a charter is to be recognized by Loyola and to be able to get money. Well, 1540 is not asking to be recognized by Loyola, nor is 1540 asking Loyola for any of it's money. Nevermind where 1540 is getting their money from. If you check your books and determine, as I'd be willing to bet you will, that 1540 has not taken any of YOUR money to do their good deeds then it's none of your business where their money came from. Unless of course they have a money tree - cause if that's the case I'd like to know who they are too.
But ultimately, 1540 does no harm to anyone. Your feelings may be hurt because they didn't pick you but get over yourself. You probably weren't picked because you obviously would have wanted to expose them.
I am absolutely disgusted at the capacity of people to spend so much time trying to prevent others from doing good deeds. As if there is nothing else for you to focus your energies on at Loyola's campus. Why not try to figure out who keeps "secretly" stealing from students and robbing students? There's a "society" I'd like to see disbanded. The criminals that BOLO's are written about. This is appalling and you two ought to be ashamed of yourselves.
Back in the day...
Fri Oct 16 2009 17:50
1540 was created along with other organizations in an effort to boost school spirit and pride. (The Pack Pride Committee comes to mind although I'm fairly certain this organization has died.) It was created based on recommendations from an external group Loyola hired to determine what they could do to boost retention. The document was presented in 98 or 99 and was an integrated marketing communications plan of about 40 pages.
As an organization, 1540 has had the cover blown a few times. Once while I was in school a student discovered where the funding for the group came from which stirred up some trouble. At another time the membership was disclosed when a student observed a meeting in the library. All it takes for anyone really interested is a little sleuthing...
For full disclosure, I should say that I've been a recipient of one of 1540s good works. Their assistance, while completely anonymous (despite a little leg work on my part), was very nice and bolstered my appreciation and admiration for Loyola.
Steve H
Fri Oct 16 2009 15:37
Good reporting, eddy. Paper looks better than ever maroon.
Just sayin
Fri Oct 16 2009 14:51
Why not be chartered under SGA, there are multiple organizations who are chartered under student government who request no money, or anthing else from SGA. You don't have to be reliant on SGA to recieve the benefits from being apart of the "group" SGA is not just a funding source, a lot of the improvements, and success loyola is having are based on student governement representatives, lobbying on the behalf of students. Your senators and justices are those people on these committee make sure students are heard,

Someone being in mulitple organizations on the court is not the problem nor is the intent of 1540, The problem is that how can you administer sanctions, and charter organizations when you're in one that isn't recognized by the university or SGA. What makes one organization better than another? I admire 1540 and the work they do,but what's stopping them from doing the same thing under student government. We can't have people on our court who support double standards, and punish those who break the rules. Where's the justice in that? Mr. Gable and Dirden are explemplory people otherwise 1540 probably would not have asked them to join or not to join, but it's inappropiate for them to be in an unsanctioned by the university or SGA.

Bigger questions:
where does 1540 get there money from?
why the need for secrecy?
who doesn't support people giving back to the loyola, community.

Besides Sarah Cooper was elected overwhelmingly, you voted for her, she has done a lot for the students, whether you realize it or not.

Pitty for Currant
Fri Oct 16 2009 13:59
Can someone please pass the mic..... away from "Currant." "Bowing to the pressure of the administration"... "Rigging Votes"... LOL..... you must have lost in some SGA election or something and are looking for a scapegoat... Poor you. Yes.....poor you.
Currant
Fri Oct 16 2009 13:39
So no rigging elections, manipulating senate votes, and bowing to the pressure of the administration is considered good deeds? Fact is, those who care enough to post on here are probably member of the glorified circle jerk that is 1540






log out