Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Churches don’t use resources wisely

Religious Reflection

Published: Friday, September 7, 2012

Updated: Friday, September 7, 2012 14:09

Tad Walter

The Maroon

TAD WALTER: Religious Reflection

Sometime during high school, the nearby mega church erected a 170 ft. tall, 97 ton, giant white cross that probably cost half a million dollars. The first time I saw the cross, I was disappointed.

Growing up in Houston, I lived just minutes away from two of the biggest churches in the United States. The first thing I would always notice about each church was the fountains before the entry ways, the huge columns, and the unnecessarily ornate interiors.

I would always wonder if the money spent on making these churches look beautiful could be better spent elsewhere. Even from a young age, I knew the answer to that question was “yes.”

The giant cross didn’t make me cry tears of joy and I wasn’t overcome with the Holy Spirit. I was disappointed that a church felt the need to build a giant cross in the middle of Houston rather than spending that money on something more fruitful to the point of the church, like mission trips, food for starving children or one of any number of charities.

In Acts 4:32-36, believers sold their houses, fields and other possessions; they gave their money to the Apostles. The Apostles took this money and didn’t build giant crosses or a huge church with chandeliers and exquisite architecture; they gave that money to the people who needed it the most.

God wants us to prosper but he doesn’t want us to live in excess, especially not when other people have legitimate need and all we have is legitimate want. The focus on the beauty of the church, rather than the spiritual beauty of its congregation, is starting to interfere with the Word and the message that the Bible is supposed to bring to people.

Mark 4:19 says, “But the worries of the world, and the deceitfulness of riches, and the desires for other things enter in and choke the word, and it becomes unfruitful.” Churches don’t need Tuscan columns or Baroque architecture to be successful and spread the Gospel. They just need to have a deep spiritual message and community to build around that message.

The sooner those certain mega churches realize this, the sooner the money will be spent on the deserving missions and charities and not on a giant cross that serves no further purpose than as a landmark used in driving directions for your visiting relatives.

Tad Walters is a history sophomore and can be reached at
tdwalters@loyno.edu

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

5 comments

Anonymous
Fri Sep 14 2012 23:31
The whole point of churches is to misuse resources. That is what they do. That is what they have always done. Go look at Leviticus and check out how sweet the Levites have it for no particular reason.
Richard Nixon
Wed Sep 12 2012 01:40
Also, there were a lot of typos in that last post. Sorry about that, but my spelling skills just haven't been the same since Watergate.
Richard Nixon
Wed Sep 12 2012 01:38
To the first comment, it's on thing to hold reverance and praise for God, but no where in the Bible does it say that we must glorify him with big churches and extravagent sanctuaries. As the author says, all a church needs is a deep spiritual message and a community to build around that message.

And for the second comment, the church is most definitely not off the beaten path. I have family in Houston and when I go to visit them I see Sagemont church literally parallel to I-10, easy to see from the interstate. And as for those cathedrals you mentioned, wasn't that one of the problems of the Catholic Churches stated in Luther's 95 Theses? The churches were a problem because the people would praise the beauty of the church, and not God. They were essentially committing idolatry with those churches.

This author did a great job of stating the facts and using the Bible to support his opinion. 10/10

Anonymous
Mon Sep 10 2012 02:25
This column would contain a sound argument if the primary purpose of a human life were to promote happiness on Earth and ensure the material security of all people. As for the primary purpose of human life, allow me to quote our patron St. Ignatius Loyola: "Man is created to praise, reverence, and serve God our Lord, and by this means to save his soul." Of course St. Ignatius would not support protestant megachurches, and neither do I, and the megachurch in question is perhaps not beautiful; but beauty, even costly beauty, is a worthy use of resources when it facilitates praising, reverencing, or serving God. It is a sad victory for the materialists that many Christians are ashamed of their beautiful churches.
Anonymous
Sat Sep 8 2012 11:40
The cross in question marks a megachurch that is somewhat off the beaten path. It tells millions of freeway passers-by where the church is. For as long as I can remember, Catholic churches were topped with crosses, for the same reason. The Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston recently invested heavily in a huge cathedral that would have been even larger if fund-raising goals had been met. Was that a mistake? And how about St. Peter's and all those other great cathedrals in Europe and throughout the world?




log out