Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Letter to the Editor: Barefoot living is neither sane nor sanitary

In response to “Barefoot culture rises on campus” from the Nov. 18 issue of The Maroon

Published: Thursday, April 26, 2012

Updated: Thursday, April 26, 2012 15:04

Dear editor:

Being from San Francisco, I’m no stranger to modern hippie culture. From dreadlock hair to facial piercings, uncleanliness in the name of non- conformity is nothing I haven’t seen before. Yet, when I first ran across Loyola students going barefoot around campus in the fall semester of 2010, I couldn’t help but be surprised. I couldn’t comprehend why students at a private university would walk around like people in a third world country. Not even students from those countries run around without any shoes upon coming to the United States.

My opinion hasn’t changed since then. I can understand walking around sans-shoes to promote a worthy cause, such as Tom’s Shoes’ One Day Without Shoes, meant to “spread awareness of the impact a pair of shoes can have on a child’s life by taking off our own.”

However, most barefoot aficionados do so for very curious reasons if for a reason at all. California Polytechnic State student Kara cites “sticking it to the man” as her primary reason for going shoeless. In an online comment to an article proposing a shoes required policy on Cal Poly’s campus she writes, “Walking around barefoot is a harmless form of liberation meant to free students from the overbearing voice of ‘the man’ and what society would define as social ‘norms.’” This is a humorous explanation at best. I highly doubt “the man” cares at all whether wanna-be hippies are wearing shoes or not. And despite what many say, people going barefoot on campus does affect the people around them. First of all, the sight and stench of many barefooters is repulsive to those forced to be around them. Second, it lowers the reputation of the university. Visitors expect to see students in pursuit of professionalism, not walking around like toddlers. Last, barefooters don’t limit their foot contact to just the ground. Many place their dirt-ridden feet on public benches and tables around campus that other students have to use as well. I can understand those who want to be “one with nature” by wearing bare feet in the wilderness. However, going barefoot in areas dominated by concrete, construction and indoor tile flooring makes no sense at all.

While barefoot running has proven benefits for runners with frequent foot problems, walking around barefoot brings health concerns not only for those who go shoeless, but also for everyone around them. Mohammed Diakite, marketing junior stated: “I think people going around barefoot on a campus is unhygienic and can lead to infections.” The whole purpose of shoes is to protect the feet from bacteria and dangerous objects that can be found on the floor.

Jeffrey Ramon, religious studies senior, proclaimed: “Solidarity is best shown through direct action. . . It’d be much more rewarding to donate a pair of shoes to someone who is in need.” With a great diversity of styles and sizes, it is perfectly easy to find a shoe that is comfortable and fits just right. There is no good reason to go barefoot on campus.

Sincerely, John Bickle, mass communication senior

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

23 comments

Anonymous
Sun Jun 24 2012 14:18
Absolutely astounding ignornace of the subject shown by the author. It just seems like an expression of blind prejudice with no factual basis to it. A bit more research would have been nice.
Anonymous
Sun Jun 24 2012 13:13
This article was clearly written by somebody whose knowledge is so unbelievably limited that it's almost comical.

"Many place their dirt-ridden feet on public benches and tables around campus that other students have to use as well."

Right, and when people do this with the bottoms of their shoes, it's somehow tolerable?

For those of us that choose not to wear shoes, we do so because shoes are harmful at worst and useless at best. There are zero health hazards that go with being barefoot. Wearing shoes, on the other hand, carries enormous health risks and is the cause of a number of ailments including bunions and athlete's foot, not to mention the damage it does to your gait.

"However, going barefoot in areas dominated by concrete, construction and indoor tile flooring makes no sense at all."

It does if having shoes on is harmful - and it is. So removing the shoes makes perfect sense regardless of the surface on which you are walking.

"Mohammed Diakite, marketing junior stated: 'I think people going around barefoot on a campus is unhygienic and can lead to infections.'"

Oh good - you asked a marketing major about the spread of clinical diseases! Not sure why you didn't decide to ask, say, a scientist who understands hygiene and infectious diseases. Try that next time if you want to bolster your case.

Anonymous
Sun Jun 24 2012 12:11
Going barefoot does not spread infection (any more than wearing sandals or flip-flops does)--this has been scientifically proven time and again. If you don't like the idea of going barefoot, then keep your shoes on, and let others either wear shoes or go without as they please. There's no reason to impose your own sense of decorum on others. Live and let live.
-Rew




log out